Two ways to engageEmbedded in your team, or accountable end to end
The same senior engineers and the same standard. The only question is who directs the work.
You direct the work
Embedded
A senior engineer inside your team.
A forward deployed engineer joins your team — your repository, your tracker, your stand-up — and works to your lead’s priorities. They take direction and bring judgement: they will tell you when a ticket is wrong, and find the thing nobody filed.
Right for you if you have an engineering lead and a clear direction, and need senior capacity that does not need managing.
- —Full-time, dedicated to your team
- —Month to month, on weeks of notice
- —Arrives with our tooling and review practice
- —Scale by adding engineers, not by re-scoping
We direct the work
End to end
Accountable for all of it.
Give us the problem and we own it from scope to production — architecture, build, release and operations — then run it until your team is ready to take it back. A named lead is accountable for the outcome, not just the code.
Right for you if you would rather hand over the problem, or nobody on your side has the time to direct the work.
- —A named lead, accountable for the outcome
- —Scoped in phases, each with a written plan
- —A working demo every week, in your environment
- —Handed back with runbooks and decision records
Either way: senior engineers only, everything in your accounts from the first week, and a named engineer on every merge. We keep the number of engagements deliberately small.
